HSE Scientists Reveal What Drives Public Trust in Science
Researchers at HSE ISSEK have analysed the level of trust in scientific knowledge in Russian society and the factors shaping attitudes and perceptions. It was found that trust in science depends more on everyday experience, social expectations, and the perceived promises of science than on objective knowledge. The article has been published in Universe of Russia.
The advancement of science and technology is a key driver of socio-economic progress. Trust in science is essential for the dissemination of knowledge, the acceptance of scientific findings, and support for research. International surveys, including the Wellcome Global Monitor and studies by the Pew Research Center, indicate that trust in science remains relatively high worldwide. However, in times of rapid social and political change—for instance, during a pandemic—new challenges emerge, and levels of trust in science may decline.
Researchers at the HSE Institute for Statistical Studies and Economics of Knowledge (ISSEK) Ivan Iudin and Valentina Polyakova analysed data from the Monitoring Survey of Innovative Behaviour of the Population, conducted between late 2020 and early 2021, to examine whether overall trust in science differs from trust in specific fields and to identify the factors influencing both.
The survey included more than 6,000 respondents aged 18 to 65, who were asked about their level of trust in scientific institutions in general and in the results obtained within six specific fields of science. According to the survey, 53% of respondents trust universities and 43% trust scientific organisations. Scientific results in medicine inspired the greatest confidence (41%), while the social sciences and humanities ranked lowest, with only 19% of respondents expressing unconditional trust.
In order to clarify the drivers behind these results, the researchers examined four factors underlying trust: perceived motivations of scientists, scientific literacy, perceived promises and reservations about science, and cultural engagement with science.
Perceptions of scientists’ motivations were assessed by asking respondents to rate their agreement with the following statements: 'Scientists help solve challenging problems,' 'Most scientists seek to improve the lives of ordinary people,' and 'Scientists are passionate individuals who work for the benefit of humanity.' Scientific literacy was assessed through a test measuring knowledge of basic school-level scientific facts, understanding of individual phenomena, and familiarity with scientific achievements and procedures. Respondents were asked to identify whether specific statements were true or false, such as: 'The Earth revolves around the Sun,' 'An electron is smaller than an atom,' and 'A laser works by focusing sound waves.'
Perceptions of the promises of science and technology, as well as reservations about them, were assessed based on respondents’ agreement or disagreement with statements such as: 'The development of science and technology brings more benefits than harm,' 'Science and technology make our lives easier and more comfortable,' 'People today place too much importance on scientific and technological achievements, neglecting the spiritual side of life,' and 'Advances in science and technology can have unexpected, dangerous consequences for human health and the environment.'
Cultural engagement with science was measured using the Scientific Information Consumption Index, which reflects how frequently individuals attend cultural and educational events and consume popular scientific content through reading, viewing, or listening.
The findings suggest that people’s trust in science is driven more by social perceptions and attitudes than by their scientific knowledge or engagement with science. Acceptance of positive stereotypes about scientists increases the likelihood of trusting scientific institutions by 5.4 times. When considering specific fields, this effect is strongest for medical and agricultural sciences, where the likelihood of trusting the results increases 8–12 fold. Adopting a scientific worldview increases the likelihood of trusting scientific institutions by 1.7 times but decreases trust in the social and human sciences by a factor of 0.6–0.7. Believing in the promise of science significantly increases trust in both institutions and scientific results, especially in the natural, exact, and engineering sciences, where trust rises by 20 to 26 times. While perceiving risks in science and technology reduces trust in institutions, it actually doubles trust in results for the natural, exact, engineering, and agricultural sciences. Similarly, regular consumption of scientific information slightly lowers trust in institutions (by 0.76 times) but boosts trust in results in the natural and exact sciences (by 1.4 times).
Valentina Polyakova
'Our study demonstrates that, overall, Russians tend to trust scientists and scientific institutions. This trust is grounded in the belief that scientists have good intentions and that scientific advancements lead to improvements in quality of life,' notes Valentina Polyakova.
Ivan Iudin
Ivan Iudin highlights several interesting patterns revealed by the study: 'With age, the likelihood of trusting scientific results decreases across all fields except agricultural sciences, while trust in scientific institutions remains unchanged. Women are generally more likely than men to trust scientific institutions, as well as results in the humanities. Urban residents exhibit higher confidence in institutions and in the results of the natural and exact sciences, engineering, and medical sciences. Conversely, rural residents show greater trust in the results of the social sciences and humanities.'
According to the authors, understanding these patterns can help guide science policy. In the event of a crisis of trust in science, science communication should emphasise the tangible benefits of scientific progress and their relevance to everyday life.
See also:
HSE Scientists Uncover Mechanism Behind Placental Lipid Metabolism Disorders in Preeclampsia
Scientists at HSE University have discovered that in preeclampsia—one of the most severe complications of pregnancy—the placenta remodels its lipid metabolism, reducing its own cholesterol synthesis while increasing cholesterol transfer to the foetus. This compensatory mechanism helps sustain foetal nutrition but accelerates placental deterioration and may lead to preterm birth. The study findings have been published in Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences.
HSE Experts Reveal Low Accuracy of Technology Forecasts in Transportation
HSE researchers evaluated the accuracy of technology forecasts in the transportation sector over the past 50 years and found that the average accuracy rate does not exceed 25%, with the lowest accuracy observed in aviation and rail transport. According to the scientists, this is due to limitations of the forecasting method and the inherent complexities of the sector. The study findings have been published in Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
Wearable Device Data and Saliva Biomarkers Help Assess Stress Resilience
A team of scientists, including researchers from HSE University, has proposed a method for assessing stress resilience using physiological markers derived from wearable devices and saliva samples. The participants who adapted better to stress showed higher heart rate variability, higher zinc concentrations in saliva, and lower potassium levels. The findings were published in the Journal of Molecular Neuroscience.
When Circumstances Are Stronger Than Habits: How Financial Stress Affects Smoking Cessation
HSE researchers have found that the likelihood of quitting smoking rises with increasing financial struggles. While low levels of financial difficulties do not affect smoking behaviour, moderate financial stress can increase the probability of quitting by 13% to 21%. Responses to high financial stress differ by gender: men are almost 1.5 times more likely to give up cigarettes than under normal conditions, whereas no significant effect is observed on women’s decisions to quit smoking. These conclusions are based on data from the Russia Longitudinal Monitoring Survey (RLMS-HSE) for 2000–2023 and have been published in Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes.
HSE Researchers Propose New Method of Verbal Fluency Analysis for Early Detection of Cognitive Impairment
Researchers from the HSE Center for Language and Brain and the Mental Health Research Centre have proposed a new method of linguistic analysis that enables the distinction between normal and pathological ageing. Using this approach, they showed that patterns in patients’ word choices during verbal fluency tests allow clinicians to more accurately differentiate clinically significant impairments from subjective memory complaints. Incorporating this type of analysis into clinical practice could improve the accuracy of early dementia diagnosis. The results have been published in Applied Neuropsychology: Adult.
How the Brain Processes a Word: HSE Researchers Compare Reading Routes in Adults and Children
Researchers from the HSE Center for Language and Brain used magnetoencephalography to study how the brains of adults and children respond to words during reading. They showed that in children the brain takes longer to process words that are frequently used in everyday speech, while rare words and pseudowords are processed in the same way—slowly and in parts. With age, the system is reorganised: high-frequency words shift to a fast route, whereas new letter combinations are still analysed slowly. The study was published in the journal Psychophysiology.
How Neural Networks Detect and Interpret Wordplay: New Insights from HSE Researchers
An international team including researchers from the HSE Faculty of Computer Science has presented KoWit-24, an annotated dataset of 2,700 Russian-language Kommersant news headlines containing wordplay. The dataset enables an assessment of how artificial intelligence detects and interprets wordplay. Experiments with five large language models show that even advanced systems still make mistakes, and that interpreting wordplay is more challenging for them than detecting it. The results were presented at the RANLP conference; the paper is available on Arxiv.org, and the dataset and the code for reproducing the experiments are available on GitHub.
HSE Economists Find That Auction Prices Depend on Artist’s Life Story
Researchers from the Centre for Big Data in Economics and Finance at the HSE Faculty of Economic Sciences have found that facts from an artist’s life are statistically significant in pricing a painting, alongside such traditional characteristics as the material, the size of the canvas, or the presence of the artist’s signature. This conclusion is based on an analysis of prices for 15,000 works by 158 artists sold since 1999 by the major auction houses Sotheby’s and Christie’s. The article has been published in the journal Empirical Studies of the Arts.
HSE Physicists Propose Unified Theory for Describing Electric Double Layer
To develop more efficient batteries and catalysts, it is essential to understand the processes occurring at the metal–solution interface in the electric double layer (EDL). Physicists at HSE MIEM have proposed a unified theoretical model of the EDL that simultaneously accounts for selective adsorption of ions on the surface and partial charge transfer between ions and the metal—phenomena that had previously been described separately. The model’s predictions are consistent with experimental data. In the future, it may be used in the development of batteries, supercapacitors, and catalysts. The study has been published in Electrochimica Acta.
HSE Researchers Experimentally Demonstrate Positive Effects of Urban Parks on the Brain
Scientists at HSE University have investigated the effect of parks on the cognitive and emotional resources of city dwellers. The researchers compared brain electrical activity in 30 participants while they watched videos of walks through parks and along busy highways. The results showed that green urban environments with trees produce a consistent effect across individuals, helping the brain calm down and relax. By contrast, walks along busy streets were found to be distracting. The findings have been published in Scientific Reports.